Fernando v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Fernando v. United States

396 F. App'x 964

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2010·No. No. 10-6455·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Warshahennedige Anton Raj Nishantha Fernando, a federal prisoner, appeals the [965]*965district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fernando v. United States, No. 5:09-hc-02018-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Warshahennedige Anton Raj Nishantha Fernando, a federal prisoner, appeals the [965]*965district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fernando v. United States, No. 5:09-hc-02018-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Fernando v. United States, 396 F. App'x 964 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

396 F. App'x 964 (Fernando v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related