Fernando Sotelo Ruiz v. State
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-19-00190-CR
FERNANDO SOTELO RUIZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 276th District Court Morris County, Texas Trial Court No. 11494-CR
Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. ORDER Our review of the reporter’s record and the clerk’s record in this case indicates that they
contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and
the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP. P.
9.10(a)(3). The reporter’s record and the clerk’s record contain the name of a person who was a
minor at the time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise,
an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not
contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).
Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper
form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the
reporter’s record and the clerk’s record contain sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or
her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed reporter’s record
and clerk’s record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: April 16, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fernando Sotelo Ruiz v. State (Fernando Sotelo Ruiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.