FERNANDO IVAN HINESTROZA v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of FERNANDO IVAN HINESTROZA v. STATE OF FLORIDA (FERNANDO IVAN HINESTROZA v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
FERNANDO HINESTROZA, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D19-3833
[October 1, 2020]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Caroline Cahill Shepherd, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502015CF006523A.
Fernando Hinestroza, Clermont, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
FERNANDO IVAN HINESTROZA v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fernando-ivan-hinestroza-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2020.