Fernando E. Hernandez v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
DecidedMarch 17, 2026
Docket07-25-00392-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Fernando E. Hernandez v. the State of Texas (Fernando E. Hernandez v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fernando E. Hernandez v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-25-00392-CR

FERNANDO E. HERNANDEZ, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. CCCR-25-288-2, Honorable Matthew H. Hand, Presiding

March 17, 2026 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.

Appellant, Fernando E. Hernandez, appeals from the trial court’s Order on

Jurisdiction and Remand, which dismissed his appeal from the Amarillo Municipal Court’s

judgment convicting him of speeding and assessing a fine. The appellate record was due

February 11, 2026. The clerk’s record was filed by this deadline. However, the reporter’s

record was not timely filed because Appellant did not request preparation or make

payment arrangements for the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(b)(2), (3). By letter of

February 10, 2026, we directed Appellant to request preparation of the record and make any necessary payment arrangements by February 20, 2026, or we would remand the

cause to the trial court for further proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(2). The

reporter has since notified the Court that Appellant has not requested preparation or paid

for the reporter’s record to date.

Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to

determine the following:

1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;

2. whether Appellant is indigent;

3. why Appellant has not timely requested preparation of the reporter’s record;

4. whether Appellant is entitled to have the reporter’s record furnished without charge pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.2; and

5. if Appellant is not entitled to have the reporter’s record furnished without charge, the date Appellant will make acceptable payment arrangements for the reporter’s record.

The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a

supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by April 16, 2026.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Fernando E. Hernandez v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fernando-e-hernandez-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp7-2026.