Fernando Bustillo v. Gary L. Henman

74 F.3d 1242, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39141, 1996 WL 19230
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 17, 1996
Docket95-1681
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 F.3d 1242 (Fernando Bustillo v. Gary L. Henman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fernando Bustillo v. Gary L. Henman, 74 F.3d 1242, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39141, 1996 WL 19230 (7th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

74 F.3d 1242

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpublished orders shall not be cited or used as precedent except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case in any federal court within the circuit.
Fernando BUSTILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gary L. HENMAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-1681.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 4, 1995.
Decided Jan. 17, 1996.

Before POSNER, Chief Judge, and FLAUM and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The appellant seeks injunctive relief against the warden and other personnel at the Marion Federal Penitentiary. Although the parties' briefs state that appellant is an inmate of Marion, the address on the appellant's brief is a different prison. We directed the parties to submit statements concerning the appellant's whereabouts and, if he is no longer at Marion, whether his request for equitable relief is moot. The statements have been submitted, and they reveal that the appellant has indeed been transferred to a different prison.

Appellant's request for injunctive relief that would change the terms of his custody at Marion is moot. We therefore vacate the order of the district court denying his request for an injunction, and remand with directions to dismiss all equitable claims as moot. Department of the Treasury v. Galioto, 477 U.S. 556 (1986); United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (1950). This order does not affect any outstanding request for damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bustillo v. Hilliard
16 F. App'x 494 (Seventh Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.3d 1242, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39141, 1996 WL 19230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fernando-bustillo-v-gary-l-henman-ca7-1996.