FERNANDO BIRBRAGHER v. MAX CHIRA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 26, 2022·No. 21-0521·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 26, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-0521 Lower Tribunal No. 19-24105 ________________

Fernando Birbragher, et al., Appellants,

vs.

Max Chira, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos Lopez, Judge.

Korte & Associates, and Brian K. Korte (West Palm Beach), for appellants.

Albert D. Rey, P.A., and Albert D. Rey, for appellee ARP Acquisitions, Corp., as Trustee.

Before EMAS, HENDON and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Aparicio v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co., 278 So. 3d 814, 816

(Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (affirming denial of motion to vacate foreclosure sale

where appellants “failed to allege ‘one or more adequate equitable factors

and make a proper showing to the trial court that they exist[ed] in the

proceedings below’”) (quoting Arsali v. Chase Home Fin. LLC, 121 So. 3d

511, 518 (Fla. 2013))

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FERNANDO BIRBRAGHER v. MAX CHIRA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

FERNANDO BIRBRAGHER v. MAX CHIRA (FERNANDO BIRBRAGHER v. MAX CHIRA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arsali v. Chase Home Finance LLC
121 So. 3d 511 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2013)