FERNANDO BIRBRAGHER v. MAX CHIRA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 26, 2022
Docket21-0521
StatusPublished

This text of FERNANDO BIRBRAGHER v. MAX CHIRA (FERNANDO BIRBRAGHER v. MAX CHIRA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
FERNANDO BIRBRAGHER v. MAX CHIRA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 26, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-0521 Lower Tribunal No. 19-24105 ________________

Fernando Birbragher, et al., Appellants,

vs.

Max Chira, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos Lopez, Judge.

Korte & Associates, and Brian K. Korte (West Palm Beach), for appellants.

Albert D. Rey, P.A., and Albert D. Rey, for appellee ARP Acquisitions, Corp., as Trustee.

Before EMAS, HENDON and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Aparicio v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co., 278 So. 3d 814, 816

(Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (affirming denial of motion to vacate foreclosure sale

where appellants “failed to allege ‘one or more adequate equitable factors

and make a proper showing to the trial court that they exist[ed] in the

proceedings below’”) (quoting Arsali v. Chase Home Fin. LLC, 121 So. 3d

511, 518 (Fla. 2013))

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arsali v. Chase Home Finance LLC
121 So. 3d 511 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
FERNANDO BIRBRAGHER v. MAX CHIRA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fernando-birbragher-v-max-chira-fladistctapp-2022.