Fernando Avila v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 27, 2019
Docket07-18-00144-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Fernando Avila v. State (Fernando Avila v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fernando Avila v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-18-00143-CR No. 07-18-00144-CR

FERNANDO AGAPITO AVILA, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 108th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 73,789-E & 75,482-E, Honorable Abe Lopez, Presiding

February 27, 2019

ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ.

Appellant Fernando Agapito Avila appeals his convictions for driving while

intoxicated and evading arrest or detention using a vehicle. We previously remanded

these causes to the trial court on August 31, 2018, for appointment of appellate counsel.

After we reinstated the appeals, appellant’s brief was due December 31, 2018. We

subsequently granted appellant’s counsel two extensions to file a brief. By letter on

February 4, 2019, we granted appellant’s counsel an extension to February 20 and

admonished counsel that failure to file the brief by this deadline would result in the appeals

being abated and the causes remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). On February 20, 2019, appellant’s counsel filed a third

motion for extension stating, for the first time, that the clerk’s record and reporter’s record

were incomplete. Counsel informed the court that he had recently requested a

supplemental clerk’s record and a supplemental reporter’s record and filed a motion for

access to the sealed clerk’s record in the trial court.

We deny appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a brief, abate the appeals,

and remand the causes to the trial court for further proceedings. On remand, the trial

court shall determine the following:

1. whether a complete clerk’s record has been filed with the Seventh Court of Appeals by the district clerk;

2. whether a complete reporter’s record has been developed and filed with the Seventh Court of Appeals by the court reporter; and

3. if not, when a supplemental clerk’s record and supplemental reporter’s record will be filed with this court.

The trial court shall also rule on appellant’s “Motion for Access to the Sealed

Clerk’s Record(s) on Appeal.” The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary

to address the aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those

matters in a supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this court by March

22, 2019. Should further time be needed to perform these tasks, then same must be

requested before March 22, 2019. Appellant is ordered to file his brief within 14 days of

the date a complete clerk’s record and reporter’s record is filed with this court. No further

extensions of the briefing deadline will be granted.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Fernando Avila v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fernando-avila-v-state-texapp-2019.