Fernando Avellaneda v. Jose A. Borja
This text of Fernando Avellaneda v. Jose A. Borja (Fernando Avellaneda v. Jose A. Borja) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ September 07, 2017
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A18A0049. FERNANDO AVELLANEDA v. JOSE A. BORJA.
This case originated as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. The magistrate court entered a judgment in favor of plaintiff Fernando Avellaneda, and defendant Jose Borja appealed to state court. The state court granted Borja’s motion for summary judgment, and Avellaneda filed the instant appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. When a state court order involves a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, an appellant is required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). Avellaneda’s failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, this case is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 09/07/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fernando Avellaneda v. Jose A. Borja, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fernando-avellaneda-v-jose-a-borja-gactapp-2017.