Fernandez v. White Plastering
This text of 816 So. 2d 1234 (Fernandez v. White Plastering) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Following the denial of his motion seeking to disqualify the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC), Ricaurte Fernandez petitions this court for prohibition relief. See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Carter, 768 So.2d 21 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)(the remedy for [1235]*1235interlocutory review of an order denying judicial disqualification is prohibition). We conclude that the JCC erred in denying the motion to disqualify, and therefore grant the petition for writ of prohibition. On remand, this cause shall be assigned to a different JCC for such further proceedings as may be necessary.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
816 So. 2d 1234, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7648, 2002 WL 1085028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fernandez-v-white-plastering-fladistctapp-2002.