Fernandez v. Toyota Lease Trust

2017 NY Slip Op 8496, 156 A.D.3d 435, 64 N.Y.S.3d 553
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 5, 2017
Docket5149N
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 8496 (Fernandez v. Toyota Lease Trust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fernandez v. Toyota Lease Trust, 2017 NY Slip Op 8496, 156 A.D.3d 435, 64 N.Y.S.3d 553 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered February 8, 2017, which, purportedly, granted plaintiff’s motion to equitably distribute the proceeds of a settlement between plaintiff and defendants by awarding plaintiff, his counsel and nonparty the Hartford $12,500 each, and amended order, same court and Justice, entered March 8, 2017, which addressed the Hartford’s cross motion, made before the prior order, by which the Hartford sought to enforce its lien in the amount of $22,408.27, as a Workers’ Compensation insurance carrier, and granted the cross motion only to the extent of recognizing the lien amount of $12,500, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the order and amended order vacated, and the matter remanded for an equitable apportionment between plaintiff and the Hartford of the actual litigation costs, including attorney’s fees, in the underlying action.

The court was without authority to arbitrarily divide the proposed settlement amount equally between plaintiff, plaintiff’s counsel and the Hartford, or to strike, waive or reduce any portion of the Hartford’s lien, beyond its share of the litigation expenses, including attorney’s fees, so that plaintiff could recover more. The court was authorized only to equitably divide the actual and demonstrable litigation costs and fees between plaintiff and the Hartford, reflecting the carrier’s total benefit (see Matter of Kelly v State Ins. Fund, 60 NY2d 131, 138 [1983]; Burns v Varriale, 9 NY3d 207, 213-214 [2007]; Hammer v Turner Constr. Corp., 39 AD3d 70S [2d Dept 2007]; Workers’ Compensation Law § 29).

Concur—Richter, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Andrias, Kern and Singh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carcione v. Essex Homes of WNY, Inc.
2020 NY Slip Op 768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 8496, 156 A.D.3d 435, 64 N.Y.S.3d 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fernandez-v-toyota-lease-trust-nyappdiv-2017.