Fernandez v. State

292 So. 2d 410
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 23, 1974
DocketNo. 73-1359
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 292 So. 2d 410 (Fernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fernandez v. State, 292 So. 2d 410 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and conviction in this cause must be reversed because the trial court has certified that due to the death of the court reporter who took the testimony, and the inability of counsel and the trial court to reconstruct a record, the Clerk is unable to prepare the necessary record that would be needed in order to review the errors assigned.

Therefore, the appellant be and he is hereby granted a new trial, pursuant to the authority of Simmons v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 200 So.2d 619; Yancey v. State, Fla. App.1972, 267 So.2d 836.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roper v. State
341 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Jackson v. State
308 So. 2d 600 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Henley v. City of Cape Coral
292 So. 2d 410 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
292 So. 2d 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fernandez-v-state-fladistctapp-1974.