Fernandez v. Silverstone Investments, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Fernandez v. Silverstone Investments, Inc.

203 F. App'x 291

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedOctober 31, 2006

DocketNos. 06-11352, 06-13188

StatusPublished

This text of 203 F. App'x 291 (Fernandez v. Silverstone Investments, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fernandez v. Silverstone Investments, Inc., 203 F. App'x 291 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court denied appellant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law notwithstanding the jury’s verdict and alternative motion for a new trial on the issue of damages. The court denied the motion for judgment as a matter of law because the evidence did not point so overwhelmingly in favor of the plaintiff that a reasonable jury could not return a verdict for the defendants. After reviewing the relevant portions of the trial transcript, we agree with the district court and thus affirm its ruling.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The district court denied appellant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law notwithstanding the jury’s verdict and alternative motion for a new trial on the issue of damages. The court denied the motion for judgment as a matter of law because the evidence did not point so overwhelmingly in favor of the plaintiff that a reasonable jury could not return a verdict for the defendants. After reviewing the relevant portions of the trial transcript, we agree with the district court and thus affirm its ruling.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 F. App'x 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fernandez-v-silverstone-investments-inc-ca11-2006.