Fernandez v. Pacific Stud Lumber Co.

529 P.2d 282, 87 N.M. 56
CourtNew Mexico Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 30, 1974
DocketNo. 1152
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 529 P.2d 282 (Fernandez v. Pacific Stud Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fernandez v. Pacific Stud Lumber Co., 529 P.2d 282, 87 N.M. 56 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

OPINION

HERNANDEZ, Judge.

Upon motion for rehearing, the previous opinion is withdrawn and the following substituted.

Neither of appellant’s two points of error have merit.

A review of the record reveals substantial evidence supporting the finding of the trial court as to the extent of appellant’s disability. Ensley v. Grace, 76 N.M. 691, 417 P.2d 885 (1966).

Appellant’s second point could only be conceded if the trial court had erred as to his first point.

Affirmed.

It is so ordered.

HENDLEY and SUTIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fernandez v. Pacific Stud Lumber Co.
529 P.2d 273 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
529 P.2d 282, 87 N.M. 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fernandez-v-pacific-stud-lumber-co-nmctapp-1974.