Fernandez v. Pacific Stud Lumber Co.
529 P.2d 282, 87 N.M. 56
Opinion
OPINION
Upon motion for rehearing, the previous opinion is withdrawn and the following substituted.
Neither of appellant’s two points of error have merit.
A review of the record reveals substantial evidence supporting the finding of the trial court as to the extent of appellant’s disability. Ensley v. Grace, 76 N.M. 691, 417 P.2d 885 (1966).
Appellant’s second point could only be conceded if the trial court had erred as to his first point.
Affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fernandez v. Pacific Stud Lumber Co., 529 P.2d 282, 87 N.M. 56 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974).
529 P.2d 282 (Fernandez v. Pacific Stud Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fernandez v. Pacific Stud Lumber Co.
529 P.2d 273 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1974)