Fernandez v. Pacific Stud Lumber Co.
This text of 529 P.2d 282 (Fernandez v. Pacific Stud Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Upon motion for rehearing, the previous opinion is withdrawn and the following substituted.
Neither of appellant’s two points of error have merit.
A review of the record reveals substantial evidence supporting the finding of the trial court as to the extent of appellant’s disability. Ensley v. Grace, 76 N.M. 691, 417 P.2d 885 (1966).
Appellant’s second point could only be conceded if the trial court had erred as to his first point.
Affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
529 P.2d 282, 87 N.M. 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fernandez-v-pacific-stud-lumber-co-nmctapp-1974.