Fernandez v. Colson

472 So. 2d 868, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1738, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14999
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 16, 1985
DocketNo. 85-115
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 472 So. 2d 868 (Fernandez v. Colson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fernandez v. Colson, 472 So. 2d 868, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1738, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14999 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the defendant’s motion to set aside a default judgment is reversed because the stipulation of counsel for the respective parties agreeing to a mutual restraining order which was filed as part of the record constituted a “paper” within the meaning of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(b). Thereafter, it was incumbent upon the movant to give notice for the application of a default. Due to this deficiency, it was not necessary for the movant, in seeking to vacate the default judgment, to establish either excusable neglect or a meritorious defense. See Kiaer v. Friendship, Inc., 376 So.2d 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

The order denying the motion to set aside the default is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Monroe Cty. v. Pigeon Key Hist. Park
647 So. 2d 857 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 So. 2d 868, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1738, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fernandez-v-colson-fladistctapp-1985.