Fernandes v. Zoning Board of Appeals
591 A.2d 811, 218 Conn. 909, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 251
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 24 Conn. App. 49, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court should not have sustained the appeal because there had been no material change of circumstances since the denial of a previous application concerning the same property?
“2. Was the record before the Appellate Court adequate for the purpose of considering the plaintiffs’ claim that the variance was granted in violation of certain provisions of the Bridgeport zoning regulations?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fernandes v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 591 A.2d 811, 218 Conn. 909, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 251 (Colo. 1991).
591 A.2d 811 (Fernandes v. Zoning Board of Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Green Falls Associates, LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals
53 A.3d 273 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2012)
Laurel Beach Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Milford
785 A.2d 1169 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2001)