Fernandes v. Rodriguez

739 A.2d 264, 251 Conn. 907, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 370
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 6, 1999
DocketSC 16198
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 739 A.2d 264 (Fernandes v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fernandes v. Rodriguez, 739 A.2d 264, 251 Conn. 907, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 370 (Colo. 1999).

Opinion

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 444 (AC 17646), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In this partition action, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court had the equitable power to order the named defendant to convey his interest in the property to the plaintiff and the plaintiff to pay the named defendant money damages?”
[908]*908The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16198. Eyvind Rodriguez, pro se, in support of the petition. Decided October 6, 1999

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fernandes v. Rodriguez
879 A.2d 897 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2005)
Fernandes v. Rodriguez
761 A.2d 1283 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
739 A.2d 264, 251 Conn. 907, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fernandes-v-rodriguez-conn-1999.