Fernald v. Young

76 Me. 356, 1884 Me. LEXIS 69
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedAugust 1, 1884
StatusPublished

This text of 76 Me. 356 (Fernald v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fernald v. Young, 76 Me. 356, 1884 Me. LEXIS 69 (Me. 1884).

Opinion

Per curiam.

In actions of trespass on lands, the defendant may file a brief statement disclaiming all title to the land described, and alleging that the trespass was involuntary, or by negligence or mistake, or in the prosecution of a legal right, and that before action brought he tendered sufficient amends therefor; and if on trial he establishes the truth of his allegations, he shall recover costs. R. S., c. 82, § 20. The question is whether one who has made such a tender will lose the benefit of it if he does not bring the money into court on the first day of the return term of the writ. It is the opinion of the court that he will; that such must be regarded as the settled law of this state; that in this particular there is no difference between tender of money due on contracts,, and tender of amends for torts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Me. 356, 1884 Me. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fernald-v-young-me-1884.