Ferman Eugene Rash Jr. and Frank Smith v. Brown Water Marine Service, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Ferman Eugene Rash Jr. and Frank Smith v. Brown Water Marine Service, Inc.

DecidedOctober 31, 2002

Docket13-02-00556-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Ferman Eugene Rash Jr. and Frank Smith v. Brown Water Marine Service, Inc. (Ferman Eugene Rash Jr. and Frank Smith v. Brown Water Marine Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferman Eugene Rash Jr. and Frank Smith v. Brown Water Marine Service, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-02-556-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

_______________________________________________________________

FERMAN EUGENE RASH, JR., ET AL., Appellants,

v.

BROWN WATER MARINE SERVICE INC., ET AL., Appellees.

________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 343rd District Court

of Aransas County, Texas.

________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Dorsey and Hinojosa

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, FERMAN EUGENE RASH, JR., ET AL., attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 343rd District Court of Aransas County, Texas, in cause number A-99-0266-CV-C. After the notice of appeal was filed, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states that this case has been resolved and appellant no longer wishes to prosecute this appeal. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellants= motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 31^st day of October, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-02-556-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

_______________________________________________________________

FERMAN EUGENE RASH, JR., ET AL., Appellants,

v.

BROWN WATER MARINE SERVICE INC., ET AL., Appellees.

________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 343rd District Court

of Aransas County, Texas.

________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Dorsey and Hinojosa

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, FERMAN EUGENE RASH, JR., ET AL., attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 343rd District Court of Aransas County, Texas, in cause number A-99-0266-CV-C. After the notice of appeal was filed, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states that this case has been resolved and appellant no longer wishes to prosecute this appeal. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellants= motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 31^st day of October, 2002.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Ferman Eugene Rash Jr. and Frank Smith v. Brown Water Marine Service, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferman-eugene-rash-jr-and-frank-smith-v-brown-wate-texapp-2002.