Ferm v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.
112 A.D. 920, 98 N.Y.S. 1102
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1906·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The defendant's motion to change the place of trial for the convenience of witnesses’ should have been denied for laches, because of the unexplained delay of thirteen months after" joinder of issue. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs .and disbursements, and motibn denied, with costs. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ. concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ferm v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co., 112 A.D. 920, 98 N.Y.S. 1102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).
112 A.D. 920 (Ferm v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thatcher v. Kitzing
242 A.D. 640 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Case v. Baldwin
236 A.D. 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)