Ferlita v. Figarrota

145 So. 607, 107 Fla. 489
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 30, 1932·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and upon briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in said decree appealed from. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by this Court that the stay order applied- for be denied, and the decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. For the proceedings to which this subsequently instituted chancery case relates, see Ferlita vs. Figarotta (opinion filed this Term, August 24, 1932), 106 Fla. 578, 145 Sou. Rep. 605.

‘Stay order denied. Decree appealed from affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Teeeell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferlita v. Figarrota, 145 So. 607, 107 Fla. 489 (Fla. 1932).

145 So. 607 (Ferlita v. Figarrota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henderson v. Ficarrotta
151 So. 380 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Morris, Parker, Smith v. State
148 So. 182 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)