Ferko v. Spisak

564 A.2d 157, 522 Pa. 503
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 6, 1989
StatusPublished

This text of 564 A.2d 157 (Ferko v. Spisak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferko v. Spisak, 564 A.2d 157, 522 Pa. 503 (Pa. 1989).

Opinion

522 Pa. 503 (1989)
564 A.2d 157

Joseph FERKO and Ann Ferko, his wife, Appellants,
v.
Michael L. SPISAK and Patricia A. Spisak, his wife, and the Borough of North East, Pennsylvania, Rocco J. and Dinah Jo Tomasino, Daniel R. and Elinor Morse, and Robert B. Haslett, Executor of the Estate of Lochner Tenney.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued September 25, 1989.
Decided October 6, 1989.
Reargument Denied November 30, 1989.

*504 Eugene J. Brew, Jr., McClure & Miller, Erie, for appellants.

Robert J. Jeffery, Orton, Dunlavey & Jeffery, P.C., North East, for Michael L. and Patricia Spisak.

Cathy M. Lojewski, North East, for other appellees.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ferko v. Spisar
564 A.2d 157 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
564 A.2d 157, 522 Pa. 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferko-v-spisak-pa-1989.