Ferguson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

44 A. 849, 64 N.J.L. 222, 35 Vroom 222, 1899 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 57
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 13, 1899·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The averment of the declaration that a telegraph wire broke and gave way at the point where it had been fastened to the pole, with such force that the plaintiff was by reason thereof thrown from the top of the pole to the ground, is not specific enough for good pleading. Race v. Easton and Amboy Railroad Co., 33 Vroom 536; Van Horn v. Railroad Co., 9 Id. 133.

But under these authorities proper practice requires that the deficient pleading be stricken out on motion only.

The demurrer is therefore overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 44 A. 849, 64 N.J.L. 222, 35 Vroom 222, 1899 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 57 (N.J. 1899).

44 A. 849 (Ferguson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. New Jersey Title Guarantee & Trust Co.
56 A. 152 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1903)