Ferguson v. United States

Supreme Court

Ferguson v. United States

375 U.S. 962, 84 S. Ct. 479

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 6, 1964

DocketNo. 198

StatusPublished

Cited by17 cases

This text of 375 U.S. 962 (Ferguson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferguson v. United States, 375 U.S. 962, 84 S. Ct. 479 (1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Certiorari, 374 U. S. 805, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The motion of the United States to remand is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that Court with directions to determine whether, in the light of the relevant circumstances, the trial court’s ruling that only one of the two defense counsel would be allowed to question each prosecution witness on cross-examination constitutes error of such magnitude as to require a reversal under the plain error rule.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Certiorari, 374 U. S. 805, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The motion of the United States to remand is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that Court with directions to determine whether, in the light of the relevant circumstances, the trial court’s ruling that only one of the two defense counsel would be allowed to question each prosecution witness on cross-examination constitutes error of such magnitude as to require a reversal under the plain error rule.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

375 U.S. 962, 84 S. Ct. 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-united-states-scotus-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack