Ferguson v. United States
375 U.S. 962, 84 S. Ct. 479
Opinion
Certiorari, 374 U. S. 805, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The motion of the United States to remand is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that Court with directions to determine whether, in the light of the relevant circumstances, the trial court’s ruling that only one of the two defense counsel would be allowed to question each prosecution witness on cross-examination constitutes error of such magnitude as to require a reversal under the plain error rule.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ferguson v. United States, 375 U.S. 962, 84 S. Ct. 479 (1964).
375 U.S. 962 (Ferguson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ideal Dairy Farms, Inc. v. Farmland Dairy Farms, Inc.
659 A.2d 904 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1995)
United States v. Young
470 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Cavalier Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Liberty Homes, Inc.
454 A.2d 367 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1983)
Williams v. Kleaveland
534 F. Supp. 912 (W.D. Michigan, 1981)
Paul Williams v. United States
651 F.2d 648 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
Lafayette Steel Co. v. National Steel Corp.
87 F.R.D. 612 (E.D. Michigan, 1980)
Exxon Corporation v. Wagner
382 A.2d 45 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Black v. Econo-Car International, Inc.
404 F. Supp. 600 (D. Massachusetts, 1975)
Stamatiou v. United States Gypsum Company
400 F. Supp. 431 (N.D. Illinois, 1975)
Bay City-Abrahams Bros., Inc. v. Estee Lauder, Inc.
375 F. Supp. 1206 (S.D. New York, 1974)
Ark Dental Supply Company v. Cavitron Corporation
323 F. Supp. 1145 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1971)
The Daily Press, Inc. v. United Press International, the Evening News Association, Knight Newspapers, Inc.
412 F.2d 126 (Sixth Circuit, 1969)
United States v. William Martin and Prince Parker
372 F.2d 63 (Seventh Circuit, 1967)
Robert Lowell Rogers v. The United States of America, Waldo Kent Ferguson v. The United States of America
369 F.2d 944 (Tenth Circuit, 1966)
United States v. Borgese
235 F. Supp. 286 (S.D. New York, 1964)
United States of America Ex Rel. Albert Dixon v. Frank J. Pate, Warden, Illinois State Penitentiary, Joliet, Illinois
330 F.2d 126 (Seventh Circuit, 1964)