Ferguson v. Tri-Pure Products Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Ferguson v. Tri-Pure Products Co.

166 So. 2d 665, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2621

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 29, 1964·No. No. 33187·Published

Opinion

ROBERTS, Justice.

By petition for writ of certiorari we liave for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 19, 1963.

Our consideration of the petition, argument of counsel, the record and the briefs leads us to conclude that the Order of the Deputy Commissioner, dated January 11, 1963 is supported by competent substantial evidence that accords with logic ■and reason. See Dixon v. Bruce Construction Corporation, 160 So.2d 116 (Fla.1963).

Accordingly, the Order of the Full Commission is quashed with directions that the Order of the Deputy Commissioner dated January 11, 1963 be reinstated.

DREW, C. J., and O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROBERTS, Justice.

By petition for writ of certiorari we liave for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 19, 1963.

Our consideration of the petition, argument of counsel, the record and the briefs leads us to conclude that the Order of the Deputy Commissioner, dated January 11, 1963 is supported by competent substantial evidence that accords with logic ■and reason. See Dixon v. Bruce Construction Corporation, 160 So.2d 116 (Fla.1963).

Accordingly, the Order of the Full Commission is quashed with directions that the Order of the Deputy Commissioner dated January 11, 1963 be reinstated.

DREW, C. J., and O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., dissents.

Ferguson v. Tri-Pure Products Co., 166 So. 2d 665, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2621 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

166 So. 2d 665 (Ferguson v. Tri-Pure Products Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related