Ferguson v. State

270 S.W. 1116, 99 Tex. Crim. 511, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 227

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ferguson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 Tex. Crim. 212 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 25, 1925·No. No. 9290.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Presiding Judge.

The offense is rape; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of thirty years.

The record is void of statement of facts and bills of exception. The indictment appears regular.

We perceive nothing in the charge of the court or the procedure revealed by the record which would authorize a reversal of the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Presiding Judge.

The offense is rape; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of thirty years.

The record is void of statement of facts and bills of exception. The indictment appears regular.

We perceive nothing in the charge of the court or the procedure revealed by the record which would authorize a reversal of the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.

Ferguson v. State, 270 S.W. 1116, 99 Tex. Crim. 511, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 227 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

270 S.W. 1116 (Ferguson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.