Ferguson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ferguson v. State

1911 OK CR 454, 118 P. 1106, 6 Okla. Crim. 653, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 466

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 14, 1911

DocketNo. A-1135.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 454 (Ferguson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferguson v. State, 1911 OK CR 454, 118 P. 1106, 6 Okla. Crim. 653, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 466 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

CURIAM.

~W. H. Ferguson, plaintiff in error, was convicted intoxicating liquor with the intent to violate the provisions of the prohibition law, and was, on March 30th, 1911, sentenced to be confined in the county jail of Caddo county for a period of sixty days and pay a fine of three hundred dollars, and that on the failure to pay such fine that he be further so confined until the same is satisfied according to law. Erom which judgment an appeal -was taken by filing in this court on May 6th, 1911, a petition in error with ease-made. Plaintiff in error, on October 5th, by his attorneys of record, filed a motion to dismiss said appeal, which motion is sustained and said appeal is accordingly dismissed and the cause remanded to the county court of Caddo county with direction to enforce the judgment and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CURIAM.

~W. H. Ferguson, plaintiff in error, was convicted intoxicating liquor with the intent to violate the provisions of the prohibition law, and was, on March 30th, 1911, sentenced to be confined in the county jail of Caddo county for a period of sixty days and pay a fine of three hundred dollars, and that on the failure to pay such fine that he be further so confined until the same is satisfied according to law. Erom which judgment an appeal -was taken by filing in this court on May 6th, 1911, a petition in error with ease-made. Plaintiff in error, on October 5th, by his attorneys of record, filed a motion to dismiss said appeal, which motion is sustained and said appeal is accordingly dismissed and the cause remanded to the county court of Caddo county with direction to enforce the judgment and sentence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 454, 118 P. 1106, 6 Okla. Crim. 653, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.