Ferguson v. State

88 S.E. 589, 17 Ga. App. 811, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 953
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 17, 1916
Docket7273
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 88 S.E. 589 (Ferguson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferguson v. State, 88 S.E. 589, 17 Ga. App. 811, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 953 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. The defendant was tried for an assault with intent to murder, and all of the evidence for the State presented the single view that he was guilty of that offense, while all of the defendant’s evidence, and likewise his statement at the trial, presented no other view than that the assault was justified. It was therefore not error for the court to fail to charge the law of manslaughter.

2. There is no substantial merit in any of the other grounds assigning error upon various excerpts from the charge of the trial judge, or upon his failure to charge certain principles of law.

3. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Russell, G. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guy v. State
33 S.E.2d 853 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 S.E. 589, 17 Ga. App. 811, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-state-gactapp-1916.