Ferguson v. State

88 So. 3d 421, 2012 WL 1696039, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7839
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ferguson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10560
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 2012·No. No. 4D10-5216·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Smith v. State, 85 So.3d 551 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Davis v. State, 69 So.3d 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), rev. granted, 81 So.3d 414 (Fla.2012); Barreneche v. State, 80 So.3d 455 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); Castano v. State, 65 So.3d 546 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

MAY, C.J., WARNER and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. State, 88 So. 3d 421, 2012 WL 1696039, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7839 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

88 So. 3d 421 (Ferguson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
69 So. 3d 315 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Barrios-Cruz v. State
63 So. 3d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Smith v. State
85 So. 3d 551 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Hernandez v. State
61 So. 3d 1144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Castano v. State
65 So. 3d 546 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Barreneche v. State
80 So. 3d 455 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)