Ferguson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ferguson v. State

956 So. 2d 1242, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7955, 2007 WL 1484743

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 23, 2007

DocketNo. 4D05-3749

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 956 So. 2d 1242 (Ferguson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferguson v. State, 956 So. 2d 1242, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7955, 2007 WL 1484743 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of Ferguson’s claims for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, except that af-firmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to file an amended motion in the trial court within thirty days of the issuance of this opinion, limited to grounds two and three (labeled four by Ferguson), addressing the requirement of availability of the witnesses, pursuant to Nelson v. State, 875 So.2d 579, 583-584 (Fla.2004)(“when a defendant fails to allege that a witness would have been available, the defendant should be granted leave to amend the motion within a specified time period”).

Affirmed.

GUNTHER, FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of Ferguson’s claims for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, except that af-firmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to file an amended motion in the trial court within thirty days of the issuance of this opinion, limited to grounds two and three (labeled four by Ferguson), addressing the requirement of availability of the witnesses, pursuant to Nelson v. State, 875 So.2d 579, 583-584 (Fla.2004)(“when a defendant fails to allege that a witness would have been available, the defendant should be granted leave to amend the motion within a specified time period”).

Affirmed.

GUNTHER, FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

956 So. 2d 1242, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7955, 2007 WL 1484743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack