Ferguson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided December 5, 2025·No. 17-1737·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: November 10, 2025

* * * * * * * * * * * * * JACOB FERGUSON, * PUBLISHED

*

Petitioner, * No. 17-1737V

*

v. * Special Master Dorsey

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Damages Award; Proffer; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Splenectomy; Immune Thrombocytopenia * Purpura (“ITP”).

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Richard Gage, Richard Gage, P.C., Cheyenne, WY, for Petitioner. Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES BASED ON PROFFER 1

On November 6, 2017, Jacob Ferguson 2 (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“Vaccine Act” or “the Program”), 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq. (2018). 3 Petitioner alleged he suffered from immune

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 The petition was initially filed by April Ferguson on behalf of her then minor son, Jacob Ferguson; however, he reached the age of majority during the pendency of this case, and the case caption was amended. Order dated July 18, 2022 (ECF No. 110). 3 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2018). All citations in this Ruling to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa.

thrombocytopenia purpura (“ITP”) as the result of a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) and meningococcal conjugate vaccinations administered on October 23, 2014. Petition at ¶¶ 1, 5-6 (ECF No. 1). On December 10, 2021, the undersigned issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding Petitioner was entitled to compensation. Ruling on Entitlement dated Dec. 10, 2021 (ECF No. 78).

On July 18, 2025, the undersigned issued a Ruling on Damages. Ruling on Damages dated Jul. 18, 2025 (ECF No. 205). The Ruling awarded Petitioner (1) $250,000.00 for pain and suffering and (2) and an amount sufficient to fund the life care plan items agreed upon by the parties as well as health insurance premium and maximum out of pocket costs awarded. Id. at 48.

On November 7, 2025, Respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation (“Proffer”), attached hereto as Appendix A. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. 4 Proffer at 4. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards Petitioner:

(1) An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract described in Section A of the Proffer, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased (the “Life Insurance Company”).

(2) A lump sum payment of $262,646.32 (representing $250,000.00 for actual pain and suffering and $12,646.32 for future life care plan expenses for the first year following the entry of judgment) to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner.

(3) A lump sum payment of $38,270.50, representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Ohio Medicaid Lien, in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and:

Ohio Department of Medicaid Ohio Tort Recovery Unit 5475 Rings Road, Suite 125 Dublin, OH 43017

Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to the State.

Proffer at 1, 4. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which Petitioner is entitled under § 15(a). Id. at 4.

4 On November 7, 2025, Petitioner filed a document entitled “Petitioner’s Acceptance of Proffer” stating: “Petitioner has reviewed the Proffer and informs the court that he accepts the terms of Respondent’s Proffer.” Pet. Acceptance of Proffer, filed Nov. 7, 2025 (ECF No. 217).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT herewith. 5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master

5 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

JACOB FERGUSON,

Petitioner,

v. No. 17-1737V Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On December 10, 2021, the Court issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding petitioner

entitled to compensation. ECF No. 78. On July 18, 2025, the Court issued a Ruling on

Damages. ECF No. 205. Respondent reserves his right, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(e), to

seek review of the Special Master’s December 10, 2021 Ruling on Entitlement and/or July 18,

2025 Ruling on Damages. Notwithstanding respondent preserving his right to seek review,

respondent recognizes the Ruling on Damages as the current law of the case, and based on the

directives in the Ruling on Damages, respondent now proffers that petitioner receive an award as

follows:

A. Life Care Items Beginning on the First Anniversary of Judgment.

Respondent proffers an amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract described

below in this Section A of this Proffer, paid to the life insurance company from which the

annuity will be purchased (the “Life Insurance Company”).1

1 Notwithstanding references herein to “the Life Insurance Company” or “the annuity contract,” to satisfy the conditions set forth herein, in respondent’s sole and absolute discretion, respondent may purchase one or more annuity contracts from one or more life insurance companies.

The Secretary of Health and Human Services agrees to purchase an annuity contract from

the Life Insurance Company for the benefit of petitioner, pursuant to which the Life Insurance

Company will agree to make payments periodically to petitioner for the following items of

compensation:

(a) For future insurance expenses, as well as home services expenses averaging $7.00 per year, beginning on the first anniversary of the date of judgment, the annual amounts reflected in Tab A,2 appended hereto, in the column titled “Totals of Items with a 4.0% Growth Rate,” to be paid up until the anniversary of the date of judgment in the year 2069, all amounts increasing at the rate of four percent (4%), compounded annually from the date of judgment;

(b) For future insurance expenses, beginning on the anniversary of the date of judgment in year 2069, an annual amount of $4,373.40 to be paid up until the anniversary of the date of judgment in the year 2070, and then beginning on the anniversary of the date of judgment in year 2070 an annual amount of $1,021.40 to be paid for the remainder of petitioner’s life, all amounts increasing at the rate of four percent (4%), compounded annually from the date of judgment;

(c) For future home services expenses, beginning on the anniversary of the date of judgement in year 2069, an annual amount of $7.00 to be paid for the remainder of petitioner’s life, all amounts increasing at the rate of four percent (4%), compounded annually from the date of judgment;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2025).

Ferguson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Ferguson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(e)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a