Ferguson v. Progress Energy of Florida, Inc.
213 F. App'x 963
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 17, 2007
DocketNo. 06-11678
StatusPublished
This text of 213 F. App'x 963 (Ferguson v. Progress Energy of Florida, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ferguson v. Progress Energy of Florida, Inc., 213 F. App'x 963 (11th Cir. 2007).
Opinion
After oral argument, we conclude that the judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed. Appellant abandoned the substantive disability claim at oral argument. For the reasons fully discussed at oral argument, we affirm the judgment of the district court on appellant’s retaliation claim.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
213 F. App'x 963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-progress-energy-of-florida-inc-ca11-2007.