Ferguson v. Previte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ferguson v. Previte

49 A.D.2d 716, 372 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10630

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 5, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 716 (Ferguson v. Previte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferguson v. Previte, 49 A.D.2d 716, 372 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10630 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 4, 1975, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, without costs and without disbursements. The Board of Elections is directed forthwith to rotate in Election Districts Nos. 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 37, 40 and 88 of the 65th Assembly District in the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, the slates of names of candidates for Democratic County Committee as required by subdivision 7 of section 242-a of the Election Law. "The mandatory rotation provision of subdivision 7 extends to all primary elections held in New York City”. (Matter of Hirschfeld v Feuer, 35 NY2d 176, 178.) Concur—Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 4, 1975, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, without costs and without disbursements. The Board of Elections is directed forthwith to rotate in Election Districts Nos. 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 37, 40 and 88 of the 65th Assembly District in the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, the slates of names of candidates for Democratic County Committee as required by subdivision 7 of section 242-a of the Election Law. "The mandatory rotation provision of subdivision 7 extends to all primary elections held in New York City”. (Matter of Hirschfeld v Feuer, 35 NY2d 176, 178.) Concur—Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 716, 372 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-previte-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack