Ferguson v. Plumbers Union

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided January 6, 1995·No. 94-1465·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion


[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 94-1465

WILLIAM V. FERGUSON, JR.,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

__________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

___________________

Before

Selya, Circuit Judge, _____________
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________
and Boudin, Circuit Judge. _____________

___________________

William V. Ferguson, Jr. on brief pro se. ________________________

__________________

__________________

Per Curiam. Pro se plaintiff William Ferguson appeals __________ ___ __

the dismissal of his third civil rights complaint against the

present defendants. Having thoroughly reviewed the record

and Ferguson's brief on appeal, we are persuaded that

Ferguson's complaint was properly dismissed as frivolous

within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 1915(d). Accordingly, the

judgment of the district court is affirmed. See Local Rule _________ ___

27.1.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. Plumbers Union, (1st Cir. 1995).

Ferguson v. Plumbers Union (Ferguson v. Plumbers Union) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.