Ferguson v. Payne
This text of 279 A.D. 968 (Ferguson v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum: We think under the evidence in this case that it was error to deny the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit. In our view, no negligence is established by reason of the defendant’s failure to establish rules for the playground (see Hoose v. Drumm, 281 N. Y. 54; Peterson v. City of New York, 267 N. Y. 204). Moreover, the evidence here does not establish that failure to adopt rules is the proximate cause of the accident. We conclude, also, that the record contains no evidence upon which a jury might properly find that the playground was maintained in a negligent or dangerous condition. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in a negligence action. One order denies defendant’s motion for a new trial; one order denies a motion to dismiss.) Present— Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Wheeler, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D. 968, 111 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-payne-nyappdiv-1952.