Ferguson v. Payne

279 A.D. 968, 111 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5452
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 5, 1952·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum: We think under the evidence in this case that it was error to deny the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit. In our view, no negligence is established by reason of the defendant’s failure to establish rules for the playground (see Hoose v. Drumm, 281 N. Y. 54; Peterson v. City of New York, 267 N. Y. 204). Moreover, the evidence here does not establish that failure to adopt rules is the proximate cause of the accident. We conclude, also, that the record contains no evidence upon which a jury might properly find that the playground was maintained in a negligent or dangerous condition. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in a negligence action. One order denies defendant’s motion for a new trial; one order denies a motion to dismiss.) Present— Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Wheeler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. Payne, 279 A.D. 968, 111 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5452 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

279 A.D. 968 (Ferguson v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Levandoski v. Jackson County School District
328 So. 2d 339 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1976)
Coulter v. Roman Catholic Church
16 A.D.2d 653 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)