Ferguson v. Murphy

273 A.D.2d 34, 708 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6315
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 6, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered May 21, 1999, which, in an action to impose a constructive trust, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly denied in light of plaintiff’s deposition testimony and affidavit describing the parties’ long-term relationship and long-range plans, including, in particular, plaintiff’s contributions in procuring and renovating the London apartment resulting in the profits that she asserts enabled defendant to purchase the New York apartment in which she claims an interest (see, Sharp v Kosmalski, 40 NY2d 119; Lester v Zimmer, 147 AD2d 340; Palazzo v Palazzo, 121 AD2d 261). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. Murphy, 273 A.D.2d 34, 708 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6315 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

273 A.D.2d 34 (Ferguson v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Braddock v. Braddock
60 A.D.3d 84 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)