Ferguson v. Miller
This text of 4 Cal. 98 (Ferguson v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The error in this case is too palpable for discussion. The paper executed by Kelly to Parks is upon its face so distinctly a mortgage that it can be called by no other name.
If the proof had shown without doubt that Kelly stood by, and saw Parks sell the property without interposing, and a knowledge of this could be brought home to Kelly’s subvendees, he and those claiming under him would be estopped from asserting title. But however suspiciously the evidence would lead us to regard the acts of these parties, it is insufficient to prove such a fraud.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Cal. 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-miller-cal-1854.