Ferguson v. Mill Creek, LP

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Ferguson v. Mill Creek, LP

DecidedMarch 22, 2017

Docket2017-UP-126

StatusUnpublished

This text of Ferguson v. Mill Creek, LP (Ferguson v. Mill Creek, LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferguson v. Mill Creek, LP, (S.C. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Ronald J. Ferguson, Appellant,

v.

Mill Creek, LP, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2015-000593

Appeal From Greenville County J. Cordell Maddox, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-126 Submitted March 1, 2017 – Filed March 22, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Ronald J. Ferguson, of Piedmont, pro se.

Rodney M. Brown, of Rodney M. Brown, P.A., of Fountain Inn, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: Duncan v. Gov't Employees Ins. Co., 331 S.C. 484, 486, 449 S.E.2d 580, 580 (1994) ("[A]n order granting a motion to intervene is not immediately appealable."). APPEAL DISMISSED.1

GEATHERS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI