Ferguson v. Mill Creek, LP
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Ronald J. Ferguson, Appellant,
v.
Mill Creek, LP, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2015-000593
Appeal From Greenville County J. Cordell Maddox, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-126 Submitted March 1, 2017 – Filed March 22, 2017
APPEAL DISMISSED
Ronald J. Ferguson, of Piedmont, pro se.
Rodney M. Brown, of Rodney M. Brown, P.A., of Fountain Inn, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: Duncan v. Gov't Employees Ins. Co., 331 S.C. 484, 486, 449 S.E.2d 580, 580 (1994) ("[A]n order granting a motion to intervene is not immediately appealable."). APPEAL DISMISSED.1
GEATHERS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.
1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ferguson v. Mill Creek, LP (Ferguson v. Mill Creek, LP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.