Ferguson v. McKee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Ferguson v. McKee

1912 OK 519, 125 P. 458, 33 Okla. 332, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 695

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 23, 1912

Docket1879

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1912 OK 519 (Ferguson v. McKee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferguson v. McKee, 1912 OK 519, 125 P. 458, 33 Okla. 332, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 695 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

HAYES, J.

This is an action of replevin begun in the district court of Adair county, by defendant in error against plaintiff in error for the recovery of certain personal property, and for damages for unlawful detention thereof. The action was begun in that court by defendant in error filing therein his petition, affidavit for replevin, and the bond, as required by law. Whereupon the clerk of the court issued an order of delivery and a summons to plaintiff in error. The order of delivery and summons were duly served on the 3d day of February, 1910. On the same day plaintiff in error executed a redelivery bond, which was duly approved by the sheriff, and the property described in the redelivery bond was returned to plaintiff in error. The cause was thereafter set down for trial on one of the days of the next regular term of said court; but plaintiff in error failed to file any answer or other pleading, and judgment by default was rendered. Thereafter he filed a motion to vacate the *333 judgment, because the service of summons had upon him was void, by reason of certain defects in the summons, which motion was by the court overruled.

It is sought to reverse the judgment of the trial court here upon the ground that it was without jurisdiction on account of the defective service; but, if it be conceded that the summons was so defective as to render the service void, still the trial court had jurisdiction to render judgment by default, for the execution by plaintiff in error of the redelivery bond, conditioned as the statute requires, constituted an entry of general appearance in the action and a waiver of any defects in the summons. Fowler v. Fowler, 15 Okla. 529, 82 Pac. 923.

It follows; therefore, that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed; and it is so ordered.

TURNER, C. J., and WILLIAMS, KANE, and DUNN, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAYES, J.

This is an action of replevin begun in the district court of Adair county, by defendant in error against plaintiff in error for the recovery of certain personal property, and for damages for unlawful detention thereof. The action was begun in that court by defendant in error filing therein his petition, affidavit for replevin, and the bond, as required by law. Whereupon the clerk of the court issued an order of delivery and a summons to plaintiff in error. The order of delivery and summons were duly served on the 3d day of February, 1910. On the same day plaintiff in error executed a redelivery bond, which was duly approved by the sheriff, and the property described in the redelivery bond was returned to plaintiff in error. The cause was thereafter set down for trial on one of the days of the next regular term of said court; but plaintiff in error failed to file any answer or other pleading, and judgment by default was rendered. Thereafter he filed a motion to vacate the *333 judgment, because the service of summons had upon him was void, by reason of certain defects in the summons, which motion was by the court overruled.

It is sought to reverse the judgment of the trial court here upon the ground that it was without jurisdiction on account of the defective service; but, if it be conceded that the summons was so defective as to render the service void, still the trial court had jurisdiction to render judgment by default, for the execution by plaintiff in error of the redelivery bond, conditioned as the statute requires, constituted an entry of general appearance in the action and a waiver of any defects in the summons. Fowler v. Fowler, 15 Okla. 529, 82 Pac. 923.

It follows; therefore, that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed; and it is so ordered.

TURNER, C. J., and WILLIAMS, KANE, and DUNN, JJ-, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK 519, 125 P. 458, 33 Okla. 332, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-mckee-okla-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack