Ferguson v. Martin

10 Mart. 295
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedSeptember 15, 1822
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Mart. 295 (Ferguson v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferguson v. Martin, 10 Mart. 295 (La. 1822).

Opinion

Porter, J.

delivered the opinion of the court. The appelle has brought up this case under the late act of the legislature, and the same questions are presented which offered themselves in that of Yeiser vs. Smith. As the appellant, whose duty it was to have furnished a statement of the facts, to enable us to correct the error, if any, in the decree of the district court, has failed to do so; we must consider that he appealed, not to reverse the judgment below, but to procrastinate its execution.

[296]*296West’n District. Sept. 1822. Oakley for the plaintiffs, Thomas for the defendant.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed with costs, and ten per centum damages for the delay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Mart. 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-martin-la-1822.