Ferguson v. Lynch

620 F. App'x 206
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2015·No. No. 15-1369·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Theresa N. Ferguson appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Ferguson’s informal brief does not challenge the district court’s holding that summary judgment was appropriate where Ferguson did not exhaust her administrative remedies in good faith, Ferguson has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. Lynch, 620 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2015).

620 F. App'x 206 (Ferguson v. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Campbell v. Wolf
W.D. North Carolina, 2023