Ferguson v. Lynch

620 F. App'x 206
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 22, 2015
DocketNo. 15-1369
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 620 F. App'x 206 (Ferguson v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferguson v. Lynch, 620 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Theresa N. Ferguson appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Ferguson’s informal brief does not challenge the district court’s holding that summary judgment was appropriate where Ferguson did not exhaust her administrative remedies in good faith, Ferguson has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. Wolf
W.D. North Carolina, 2023

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
620 F. App'x 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-lynch-ca4-2015.