Ferguson v. Luce
This text of 1 White & W. 269 (Ferguson v. Luce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
§ 537. Deposition where party taking reads part of; adverse party may read balance, when, though he did not file cross-interrogatories. The plaintiff read a portion of the deposition of the witness Redfield, but when defendant proposed to read the other portion, relating to the same subject, which plaintiff had declined to read, plaintiff objected, because defendant had not crossed the interrogatories, and therefore had no interest in the deposition, and was not entitled to read it. This objection was sustained by the court. In this the court erred, the defendant being entitled to have the whole on the same subject read after plaintiff had read a portion of the deposition.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 White & W. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-luce-texapp-1878.