Ferguson v. Lomenzo
This text of 30 A.D.2d 982 (Ferguson v. Lomenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, without costs. We find no reason to interfere with the discretion exercised by Special Term in directing that the certificate of acceptance be filed. (Election Law, § 330.) Appellant now concedes that petitioner is not rendered ineligible by reason of his conviction of crime. (See U. S. Const., art. I, § 3, par. 3; Matter of O’Connor V. Cohen, 173 Misc. 419; State ex rel. Handley v. Superior Court of Marion County. 238 Ind. 421; Opinion of the Judges, 79 S. D. 585; State ex rel. Johnson v. Crane, 65 Wyo. 189.) Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court. [57 Misc 2d 1041.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 A.D.2d 982, 294 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-lomenzo-nyappdiv-1968.