Ferguson v. Krupicka
This text of 377 N.W.2d 541 (Ferguson v. Krupicka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff, Richard L. Ferguson, a farm laborer, was injured [450]*450while hanging a barn door for his employer, defendant Robert C. Krupicka. A jury verdict was returned in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appeals; his sole assignment of error is that the court’s jury instruction No. 4 concerning defendant’s duty of safety toward plaintiff should have provided a higher degree of care because of the hazardous nature of farmwork.
This court has consistently applied the same safety rules in farm-employer liability cases as in nonfarm cases. Lyons v. Wagner, 185 Neb. 214, 174 N.W.2d 730 (1970). The given instruction No. 4, along with all of the other instructions, fully and adequately submitted the case to the jury, and the evidence supports the verdict.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
377 N.W.2d 541, 221 Neb. 449, 1985 Neb. LEXIS 1294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-krupicka-neb-1985.