Ferguson v. Hess Corp.

138 A.D.3d 549, 28 N.Y.S.3d 591
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 19, 2016·No. 856 106855/09 590607/11 590928/11·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered April 28, 2015, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied the motion of defendant Abro Management Corp. (Abro) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Abro’s motion was properly denied in this action where plaintiff alleges that she was injured when a metal plate in a sidewalk, adjacent to the premises managed by Abro, flipped up when she stepped on it, causing her to fall into the depression underneath. The record presents triable issues of fact regarding whether Abro created the dangerous condition, since it had contracted for repairs and performed the sidewalk restoration work itself (see Church v Callanan Indus., 99 NY2d 104, 111 [2002]; McNeill v LaSalle Partners, 52 AD3d 407, 411 [1st Dept 2008]).

We have considered Abro’s other arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Friedman, J.R, Andrias, Moskowitz, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. Hess Corp., 138 A.D.3d 549, 28 N.Y.S.3d 591 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

138 A.D.3d 549 (Ferguson v. Hess Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Church v. Callanan Industries, Inc.
782 N.E.2d 50 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
McNeill v. LaSalle Partners
52 A.D.3d 407 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)