Ferguson v. Hess Corp.

89 A.D.3d 599, 932 N.Y.2d 904
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 22, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 A.D.3d 599 (Ferguson v. Hess Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferguson v. Hess Corp., 89 A.D.3d 599, 932 N.Y.2d 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in vacating plaintiffs default and restoring the action to the calendar. The action has merit, plaintiff has substantially complied with discovery and retained new counsel, and there is a strong public policy favoring resolution of cases on the merits (Chevalier v 368 E. 148th St. Assoc., LLC, 80 AD3d 411, 413-414 [2011]). In view of the foregoing, we need not reach defendants’ argument regarding plaintiffs motion to renew.

[600]*600We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.E, Saxe, Sweeny, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tenamaza v. Knickerbocker Construction II, LLC
96 A.D.3d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A.D.3d 599, 932 N.Y.2d 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-hess-corp-nyappdiv-2011.