Ferguson v. . Ferguson

174 S.E. 304, 206 N.C. 483, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 224
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 2, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 174 S.E. 304 (Ferguson v. . Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferguson v. . Ferguson, 174 S.E. 304, 206 N.C. 483, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 224 (N.C. 1934).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J".

Delivery of the deed being essential to its validity and the question having been put in issue by the pleadings, it would seem that the matter should have been submitted to the jury for determination. Lynch v. Johnson, 171 N. C., 611, 89 S. E., 61. Indeed, it may be doubted whether the defendant ever acquired title to the property under the deed in question, it appearing that the “conditions precedent to the vesting of the title” have not been met. Helms v. Helms, 135 N. C., 164, 47 S. E., 415. But, however this may be, the issue of delivery remains undetermined on the record.

New trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ferguson v. . Ferguson
178 S.E. 845 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 S.E. 304, 206 N.C. 483, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-ferguson-nc-1934.