Ferguson v. Farmers State Bank

67 Colo. 184
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedSeptember 15, 1919
DocketNo. 9637
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 67 Colo. 184 (Ferguson v. Farmers State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferguson v. Farmers State Bank, 67 Colo. 184 (Colo. 1919).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Teller.

Defendant in error took judgment by confession under warrants of attorney attached to two promissory notes executed by the plaintiffs in error, and assigned by the payee to defendant in error.

Judgment was entered on a cognovit some fifteen months after the delivery of the notes, and three months after they, were due.

Plaintiffs in error seasonably filed a motion to set aside the judgment, and supported it with affidavits alleging that the notes were obtained by misrepresentation and fraud and without consideration, of all of which the defendant in error had full knowledge. A counter affidavit was filed by the bank denying knowledge of any defects in the note or ip payee’s title.

[185]*185The motion was overruled, and the cause is before us on application for a supersedeas.

The motion to vacate the judgment should have been sustained. The general rule in that, where, in such a case, it is made to appear by affidavit that the judgment debtor has a meritorious defense, the court should set aside the judgment and allow the defense to be made in a trial to a jury.

The issue as to the bank’s knowledge ought not to be tried by the court on such motion. Dionne v. Matzenbaugh, 49 Ill. App. 527, Lake v. Cook, 15 Ill. 353.

In Richards v. First National Bank, 59 Colo. 403, 148 Pac. 912, this court held that a judgment confessed under power of attorney will be vacated and a defense allowed, where application is made in apt time, and the affidavit in support thereof makes out a prima facie case of a defense upon the merits; and this notwithstanding counter affidavits are filed denying the matters alleged as a defense.

The judgment is reversed, with directions for the trial of the cause on its merits.

Chief Justice Garrigues and Mr. Justice Burke concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Westring v. Cheyenne National Bank
393 P.2d 119 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1964)
Commercial Credit Co. v. Calkins
241 P. 529 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1925)
McGinnis v. Hukill
208 P. 248 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1922)
Cozart v. Haines
68 Colo. 261 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Colo. 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-farmers-state-bank-colo-1919.