Ferguson v. Elna Elec., Inc.

421 So. 2d 805, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28180
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 1982·No. 82-132·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

421 So.2d 805 (1982)

Michael FERGUSON, Appellant,
v.
ELNA ELECTRIC, INC., Appellee.

No. 82-132.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 16, 1982.

*806 Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, William Huggett and Arnold Ginsberg, Miami, for appellant.

Pyszka & Kessler and William G. Edwards, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment solely for the reason that appellant, having demanded and been paid worker's compensation benefits, was estopped to deny that he was injured while in the course and scope of his employment. Matthews v. G.S.P. Corporation, 354 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). We specifically do not decide, because it is unnecessary, whether appellee was in fact engaged in a special errand for his employer when he was injured.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. Elna Elec., Inc., 421 So. 2d 805, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28180 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

421 So. 2d 805 (Ferguson v. Elna Elec., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tractor Supply Co. v. Kent
966 So. 2d 978 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Martin Electronics, Inc. v. Jones
877 So. 2d 765 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Byerley v. Citrus Pub., Inc.
725 So. 2d 1230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Michael v. Centex-Rooney Const. Co.
645 So. 2d 133 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Pauzoulis v. Metropolitan Dade County
537 So. 2d 1133 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Ferraro v. Marr
467 So. 2d 809 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)