Ferguson v. Cosby

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ferguson v. Cosby

181 S.E. 231, 51 Ga. App. 684, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 442

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 4, 1935

Docket24541

StatusPublished

This text of 181 S.E. 231 (Ferguson v. Cosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferguson v. Cosby, 181 S.E. 231, 51 Ga. App. 684, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 442 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

The only error assigned in the direct bill of exceptions in the instant case being one which can not be determined from the record without a consideration of an alleged agreed statement of facts which is not embodied in the bill of exceptions, or attached as an exhibit thereto and properly authenticated, or contained in a brief of evidence approved by the trial judge and made a part of the record (the only showing of such approval being an unsigned entry in the transcript), the judgment rendered by the court, without the intervention of a jury, finding the property subject to the execution, must be affirmed. Silvey v. Brown, 137 Ga. 104 (72 S. E. 907) ; Robinson v. Woodward, 134 Ga. 777 (68 S. E. 553) ; Federal Investment Co. v. Emng, 165 Ga. 435 (141 S. E. 65).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

The only error assigned in the direct bill of exceptions in the instant case being one which can not be determined from the record without a consideration of an alleged agreed statement of facts which is not embodied in the bill of exceptions, or attached as an exhibit thereto and properly authenticated, or contained in a brief of evidence approved by the trial judge and made a part of the record (the only showing of such approval being an unsigned entry in the transcript), the judgment rendered by the court, without the intervention of a jury, finding the property subject to the execution, must be affirmed. Silvey v. Brown, 137 Ga. 104 (72 S. E. 907) ; Robinson v. Woodward, 134 Ga. 777 (68 S. E. 553) ; Federal Investment Co. v. Emng, 165 Ga. 435 (141 S. E. 65).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 S.E. 231, 51 Ga. App. 684, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-cosby-gactapp-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack