Ferguson v. Constellation Energy Group, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 2009
Docket08-2327
StatusUnpublished

This text of Ferguson v. Constellation Energy Group, Inc. (Ferguson v. Constellation Energy Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferguson v. Constellation Energy Group, Inc., (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2327

MARTY R. FERGUSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC.; ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS INCORPORATED AND AFFILIATES; STATE OF MARYLAND; FRANK A. CAHN AND ASSOCIATES; BGE HOME PRODUCTS AND SERVICES; BRYANT FERGUSON; WILLIE MAY FERGUSON; LABOR READY,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00274-RDB)

Submitted: April 8, 2009 Decided: April 20, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marty R. Ferguson, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara A. Gaughan, CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, Baltimore, Maryland; Robert M. Gittins, William John Hickey, Rockville, Maryland; Charles J. Butler, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Frank B. Cahn, III, LAW OFFICE OF FRANK B. CAHN, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Marty R. Ferguson appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for appointment of counsel and dismissing his

civil complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Ferguson v. Constellation Energy Group, Inc., No. 1:08-

cv-00274-RDB (D. Md. Nov. 12, 2008; Nov. 20, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ferguson v. Constellation Energy Group, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-constellation-energy-group-inc-ca4-2009.